ICG-Sulfo-EG4-OSu

Image Viewer
Chemical structure for ICG-Sulfo-EG4-OSu
Roll over image to zoom in
Loading...
 
Unit Size: Cat No: Price (USD): Qty:
1 mg 183 $345


Export item/cart as Excel file

Send item/cart as email
EXPORT TO EXCEL X

Export:
EXPORT TO EMAIL X
Important: We request your email address to ensure that the recipient(s) knows you intended for them to see the email, and that it is not junk mail.
Export:
Your Name*:
Your Email*:
Recipient Email*:
Your Personal Message:
Additional Ordering Information
Telephone: 1-800-990-8053
Fax: 1-408-733-1304
Email: sales@aatbio.com
International: See distributors





Overview

Ex/Em (nm)780/800
MW1177.36
SolventDMSO
Storage F/D/L
Category Classic Labeling Dyes
Cyanines
Related Peptide Labeling Reagents
Dye Labeling Reagents
Secondary Reagents
Indocyanine green (ICG) is a cyanine dye used in medical diagnostics. It is used for determining cardiac output, hepatic function, and liver blood flow, and for ophthalmic angiography. It has a peak spectral absorption close to 800 nm. These infrared frequencies penetrate retinal layers, allowing ICG angiography to image deeper patterns of circulation than fluorescein angiography. Conventional activated ICG dye, ICG-Sulfo-OSu, has been used for preparing ICG-antibody conjugates utilized in in vivo imaging research as antibody conjugates. However, the ICG hydrophobicity often causes some unspecific bindings. The PEG-modified ICG dyes are used to increase the hydrophilicity of the ICG dyes. The PEGylated ICGs shows better water solubility and significantly reducing unspecific binding.




Calculators
Common stock solution preparation

Table 1. Volume of DMSO needed to reconstitute specific mass of ICG-Sulfo-EG4-OSu to given concentration. Note that volume is only for preparing stock solution. Refer to sample experimental protocol for appropriate experimental/physiological buffers.



Molarity calculator

Table 2. Enter any two values (mass, volume, concentration) to calculate the third.

Mass Molecular weight Volume Concentration Moles
/ = x =
 






Spectrum Advanced Spectrum Viewer

Sorry, your browser does not support inline SVG. Relative Intensity (%) 100 80 60 40 20 0 Sorry, your browser does not support inline SVG.
Sorry, your browser does not support inline SVG. Sorry, your browser does not support inline SVG.
Move mouse over grid to display wavelength & intensity values.

300
400
500
600
700
800
900
Wavelength (nm)





Protocol


Quick Preview

This protocol only provides a guideline, and should be modified according to your specific needs.

Sample Labeling Protocol

Note: This labeling protocol was developed for the conjugate of Goat anti-mouse IgG with ICG. You might need further optimization for your particular proteins.

1. Prepare protein stock solution (Solution A):

Mix 100 µL of a reaction buffer (e.g., 1 M  sodium carbonate solution or 1 M phosphate buffer with pH ~9.0) with 900 µL of the target protein solution (e.g. antibody, protein concentration >2 mg/ml if possible) to give 1 mL protein labeling stock solution.

Note 1: The pH of the protein solution (Solution A) should be 8.5 ± 0.5. If the pH of the protein solution is lower than 8.0, adjust the pH to the range of 8.0-9.0 using 1 M  sodium bicarbonate solution or 1 M pH 9.0 phosphate buffer.

Note 2: The protein should be dissolved in 1X phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.2-7.4. If the protein is dissolved in Tris or glycine buffer, it must be dialyzed against 1X PBS, pH 7.2-7.4, to remove free amines or ammonium salts (such as ammonium sulfate and ammonium acetate) that are widely used for protein precipitation.

Note 3: Impure antibodies or antibodies stabilized with bovine serum albumin (BSA) or gelatin will not be labeled well. The presence of sodium azide or thimerosal might also interfere with the conjugation reaction. Sodium azide or thimerosal can be removed by dialysis or spin column for optimal labeling results.

Note 4: The conjugation efficiency is significantly reduced if the protein concentration is less than 2 mg/mL. For optimal labeling efficiency the final protein concentration range of 2-10 mg/mL is recommended.

2. Prepare dye stock solution (Solution B):

Add anhydrous DMSO into the vial of ICG dyes to make a 10-20 mM stock solution. Mix well by pipetting or vortex.

Note: Prepare the dye stock solution (Solution B) before starting the conjugation. Use promptly. Extended storage of the dye stock solution may reduce the dye activity. Solution B can be stored in freezer for two weeks when kept from light and moisture. Avoid freeze-thaw cycles.

3. Determine the optimal dye/protein ratio (optional):

Note: Each protein requires distinct dye/protein ratio, which also depends on the properties of dyes. Over labeling of a protein could detrimentally affects its binding affinity while the protein conjugates of low dye/protein ratio gives reduced sensitivity. We recommend you experimentally determine the best dye/protein ratio by repeating Steps 4 and 5 using a serial different amount of labeling dye solutions. In general 4-6 dyes/protein are recommended for most of dye-protein conjugates.

3.1    Use 10:1 molar ratio of Solution B (dye)/Solution A (protein) as the starting point:  Add 5 µl of the dye stock solution (Solution B, assuming the dye stock solution is 10 mM) into the vial of the protein solution (95 µl of Solution A) with effective shaking. The concentration of the protein is ~0.05 mM assuming the protein concentration is 10 mg/mL and the molecular weight of the protein is ~200KD.  

Note: The concentration of the DMSO in the protein solution should be <10 %.

 

3.2    Run conjugation reaction (see Step 4 below).

3.3    Repeat #3.2 with the molar ratios of Solution B/Solution A at 5:1; 15:1 and 20:1 respectively.

3.4    Purify the desired conjugates using premade spin columns.

3.5    Calculate the dye/protein ratio (DOS) for the above 4 conjugates (see next page).

3.6    Run your functional tests of the above 4 conjugates to determine the best dye/protein ratio to scale up your labeling reaction.

4. Run conjugation reaction:

4.1 Add the appropriate amount of dye stock solution (Solution B) into the vial of the protein solution (Solution A) with effective shaking.

Note: The best molar ratio of Solution B/Solution is determined from Step 3.6. If Step 3 is skipped, we recommend using 10:1 molar ratio of Solution B (dye)/Solution A (protein).

4.2 Continue to rotate or shake the reaction mixture at room temperature for 30-60 minutes.

5. Purify the conjugation

The following protocol is an example of dye-protein conjugate purification by using a Sephadex G-25 column.

5.1    Prepare Sephadex G-25 column according to the manufacture instruction.

 

5.2    Load the reaction mixture (directly from Step 4) to the top of the Sephadex G-25 column.

 

5.3    Add PBS (pH 7.2-7.4) as soon as the sample runs just below the top resin surface.

 

5.4    Add more PBS (pH 7.2-7.4) to the desired sample to complete the column purification. Combine the fractions that contain the desired dye-protein conjugate.

 

Note 1: For immediate use, the dye-protein conjugate need be diluted with staining buffer, and aliquoted for multiple uses.

Note 2: For longer term storage, dye-protein conjugate solution need be concentrated or freeze dried (see below).

Characterize the Desired Dye-Protein Conjugate

The Degree of Substitution (DOS) is the most important factor for characterizing dye-labeled protein. Proteins of lower DOS usually have weaker fluorescence intensity, but proteins of higher DOS (e.g. DOS > 6) tend to have reduced fluorescence too. The optimal DOS for most antibodies is recommended between 2 and 10 depending on the properties of dye and protein. For effective labeling, the degree of substitution should be controlled to have 4-10 moles of ICG to one mole of antibody. The following steps are used to determine the DOS of ICG labeled proteins.

 

1. Measure absorption:

                To measure the absorption spectrum of a dye-protein conjugate, it is recommended to keep the sample concentration in the range of 1-10 µM depending on the extinction coefficient of the dye.

 

2. Read OD (absorbance) at 280 nm and dye maximum absorption (ƛmax = 785 nm for ICG dyes):

For most spectrophotometers, the sample (from the column fractions) need be diluted with de-ionized water so that the OD values are in the range of 0.1 to 0.9. The O.D. (absorbance) at 280 nm is the maximum absorption of protein while 785 nm is the maximum absorption of ICG dyes. To obtain accurate DOS, make sure that the conjugate is free of the non-conjugated dye.

 

3. Calculate DOS using the following equations:

 

3.1    Calculate protein concentration

 

3.2    Calculate

 

3.3    Calculate the degree of labeling DOS = [Dye]/[Protein] =[DOD785´Pε280] /[230000 ×(A280-0.073A785)]

 

[Dye] is the dye concentration, and can be readily calculated from the Bee-Lambert Law: A=εdyeCL. [Protein] is the protein concentration. This value can be either estimated by the weight (added to the reaction) if the conjugation efficiency is high enough (preferably > 70%) or more accurately calculated by the Beer-Lambert Law: A=εproteinCL. For example, IgG has the ε value to be 203,000 cm-1M-1. Pε280 protein molar extinction coefficient at 280 nm (e. g. the molar extinction coefficient of IgG is 203,000

cm-1M-1). CF (dye absorption correction factor at 280 nm ) = OD280/OD750 =  0.073 for ICG-Sulfo-OSu. 230,000 cm-1M-1 is the molar extinction coefficient of ICG-Sulfo-OSu.






References & Citations

Assessment of Lexiscan for Blood Brain Barrier disruption to facilitate Fluorescence brain imaging
Authors: Rebecca W Pak, Hanh Le, Heather Valentine, Daniel Thorek, Arman Rahmim, Dean Wong, Jin U Kang
Journal: (2017): ATu3B--2

Bioengineering of injectable encapsulated aggregates of pluripotent stem cells for therapy of myocardial infarction
Authors: Shuting Zhao, Zhaobin Xu, Hai Wang, Benjamin E Reese, Liubov V Gushchina, Meng Jiang, Pranay Agarwal, Jiangsheng Xu, Mingjun Zhang, Rulong Shen
Journal: Nature Communications (2016): 13306

Deep Photoacoustic/Luminescence/Magnetic Resonance Multimodal Imaging in Living Subjects Using High-Efficiency Upconversion Nanocomposites
Authors: Yu Liu, Ning Kang, Jing Lv, Zijian Zhou, Qingliang Zhao, Lingceng Ma, Zhong Chen, Lei Ren, Liming Nie
Journal: Advanced Materials (2016)

Single-Layer MoS2 Nanosheets with Amplified Photoacoustic Effect for Highly Sensitive Photoacoustic Imaging of Orthotopic Brain Tumors
Authors: Jingqin Chen, Chengbo Liu, Dehong Hu, Feng Wang, Haiwei Wu, Xiaojing Gong, Xin Liu, Liang Song, Zonghai Sheng, Hairong Zheng
Journal: Advanced Functional Materials (2016)

In Vitro and In Vivo Analysis of Indocyanine Green-Labeled Panitumumab for Optical Imaging A Cautionary Tale
Authors: Yang Zhou, Young-Seung Kim, Diane E Milenic, Kwamena E Baidoo, Martin W Brechbiel
Journal: Bioconjugate chemistry (2014): 1801--1810