How is it different from the Direct ELISA?
An enyzme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) can be done with a varitey of modifications to its basic protocol. For example, the direct ELISA uses an enzyme-labeled primary antibody conjugate to detect immobilized antigens. However, since it is just a 1:1 stoichiometric ratio, amplifying or improving the signal strength for ease or reading and more exact measurements is impossible.
The indirect ELISA adds another step to the baseline direct ELISA process. The antigen of choice is bound to the experimental surface, and an unlabeled primary antibody specific for it is added and binds to the antigen. Subsequently, an enzyme-labeled secondary antibody is added and binds to the primary antibody. This not only gives a customizable signal but allows for more adaptability of the process for the specific experiment, since the secondary antibody can be directed against more than one primary antibody. A coloreless substrate is introduced to the sample, which reacts with the enzyme conjugate, and produces a measurable byproduct. Depending on the choice of substrate, this byproduct can be either colorimetric, chemiluminescent or fluroescent.
A researcher must consider multiple criteria when deciding which assay to include in an experimental protocol. A selection of factors to weigh for the Indirect ELISA are included in the table below.
Figure 1. Illustrates the setup of an colorimetric indirect ELISA.
Indirect ELISA detection | ||
Advantages |
| |
Disadvantages |
|